Quality control
We describe quality through the structure that runs the project: scope control, inspection planning, interface management and close-out.
The principles below describe how we work. We cite no standard numbers and no certifications — we publish those only when we hold the supporting document, and none has been provided.
Scope, programme and reporting are run as one structure. Progress is reported against scope, not against an impression of how fast work is going.
Hold points are mapped to stages of scope and carried out while an element can still be corrected. A check after the routes are covered has no evidential value.
We keep a register of interfaces with the other project participants. Each interface has a named owner on both sides and a described handover condition.
The punch list is part of the observation register, not a separate end-of-job document. An item closes once close-out is confirmed, not once completion is reported.
Safety is run as part of site coordination. Where works run in parallel we agree zones and sequencing rather than resolving clashes on the spot.
Documentation is produced alongside the works so that handover confirms the actual state. A complete document set is a condition of handover, not a consequence of it.
Safety indicators and incident statistics are shared on request, based on actual records. We do not publish them as a slogan and we quote no figure without a source.
Site rules take precedence over the programme. Work in restricted zones is carried out only on terms agreed with the main contractor.
Audit
We share our inspection plan, observation register and handover record templates. It is the fastest way to judge the fit with your procedure.
